1967 Alpine A vs. 1995 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,391 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 713 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alpine A | 1995 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
| Model | A | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 3391 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1413 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |
