1967 Alpine A vs. 1996 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lotus Elan weights approximately 320 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alpine A | 1996 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Alpine | Lotus |
Model | A | Elan |
Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2260 mm |