1967 Alpine A vs. 1998 Peugeot Tulip
To start off, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,996 cc, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Peugeot Tulip weights approximately 180 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alpine A | 1998 Peugeot Tulip | |
Make | Alpine | Peugeot |
Model | A | Tulip |
Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 880 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 45 L |