1967 Alpine A vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (189 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 419 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alpine A | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Alpine | Toyota |
Model | A | Celica |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 55 L |