1967 Alpine A vs. 2001 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 314 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar XJ220 weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alpine A | 2001 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Alpine | Jaguar |
| Model | A | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 3492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2230 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2720 mm |
