1967 Alpine A vs. 2002 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2002 Cadillac XLR is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac XLR (316 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 954 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alpine A | 2002 Cadillac XLR | |
| Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
| Model | A | XLR |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 4570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 316 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |
