1967 Alpine A vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Alpine A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Smart (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MCC Smart weights approximately 90 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alpine A | 2002 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Alpine | MCC |
| Model | A | Smart |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 35 L |
