1967 Alpine A vs. 2002 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2002 MG ZT-T is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MG ZT-T (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MG ZT-T weights approximately 925 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 MG ZT-T, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alpine A | 2002 MG ZT-T | |
Make | Alpine | MG |
Model | A | ZT-T |
Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2830 mm |