1967 Alpine A vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alpine A | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Alpine | Toyota |
Model | A | Tundra |
Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3270 mm |