1967 Alpine A vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 600 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alpine A | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
| Model | A | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 61 L |
