1967 Alpine A vs. 2005 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2005 Toyota Camry is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,362 cc, 2005 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Camry (144 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Camry weights approximately 240 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alpine A | 2005 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Alpine | Toyota |
| Model | A | Camry |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2362 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 144 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 940 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |
