1967 Alpine A vs. 2006 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac STS weights approximately 1118 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alpine A | 2006 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
| Model | A | STS |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1818 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 66 L |
