1967 Alpine A vs. 2008 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2008 Ford Taurus is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Taurus (263 HP @ 6251 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Taurus weights approximately 410 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alpine A | 2008 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A | Taurus |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6251 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 78 L |