1967 Alpine A vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 860 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alpine A | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
| Model | A | BLS |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2792 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 58 L |
