1967 Alpine A vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,258 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A.
Because 1967 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alpine A | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A | 5 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2258 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |