1967 Alpine A vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Ranger weights approximately 747 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alpine A | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A | Ranger |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1447 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 74 L |