1967 Alpine A vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alpine A | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |