1967 Alpine A vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1484 kg more than 1967 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alpine A | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Alpine | Toyota |
| Model | A | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 2184 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 87 L |
