1967 Alvis TF vs. 1992 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1992 Ford Falcon is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alvis TF would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Falcon (161 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1967 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1967 Alvis TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Alvis TF weights approximately 105 kg more than 1992 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Falcon (311 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alvis TF | 1992 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Alvis | Ford |
Model | TF | Falcon |
Year Released | 1967 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 311 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2800 mm |