1967 Alvis TF vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Alvis TF (150 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Alvis TF weights approximately 900 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alvis TF | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Alvis | MCC |
| Model | TF | Smart |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 53 HP |
| Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1460 mm |
