1967 Alvis TF vs. 2001 Audi AL2
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Alvis TF weights approximately 654 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Alvis TF. (247 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alvis TF | 2001 Audi AL2 | |
Make | Alvis | Audi |
Model | TF | AL2 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 900 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2470 mm |