1967 Alvis TF vs. 2003 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2003 Ford Windstar is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alvis TF would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 150 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 1967 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Alvis TF | 2003 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Alvis | Ford |
| Model | TF | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3066 mm |
