1967 Alvis TF vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1967 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1967 Alvis TF.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alvis TF | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Alvis | Mazda |
Model | TF | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3010 mm |