1967 Alvis TF vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alvis TF would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1967 Alvis TF. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1967 Alvis TF.
Because 1967 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Alvis TF (247 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1967 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Alvis TF | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Alvis | Holden |
Model | TF | Epica |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 247 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2700 mm |