1967 Aston Martin DB6 vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Aston Martin DB6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Aston Martin DB6 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Aston Martin DB6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Aston Martin DB6 (282 HP) has 212 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Aston Martin DB6 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Aston Martin DB6 weights approximately 885 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Aston Martin DB6 (400 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1967 Aston Martin DB6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Aston Martin DB6 2003 MCC Crossblade
Make Aston Martin MCC
Model DB6 Crossblade
Year Released 1967 2003
Engine Size 3995 cc 598 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 282 HP 70 HP
Torque 400 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3210 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1625 kg 740 kg
Vehicle Length 4630 mm 2630 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 1810 mm