1967 Audi Variant vs. 1954 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1967 Audi Variant is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1967 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1967 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 930 kg more than 1967 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Audi Variant | 1954 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | Variant | 62 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 5423 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3290 mm |