1967 Audi Variant vs. 1969 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1969 Ford Fairlane is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1967 Audi Variant. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1967 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 240 kg more than 1967 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Audi Variant | 1969 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | Variant | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 2781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 40 L |
