1967 Audi Variant vs. 1978 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1978 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Audi Variant would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 410 kg more than 1967 Audi Variant.
Because 1978 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Audi Variant | 1978 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | Variant | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1967 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 4186 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2760 mm |