1967 Audi Variant vs. 1996 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1996 Toyota Celica is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1967 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1967 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Celica weights approximately 25 kg more than 1967 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Celica (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Audi Variant | 1996 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | Variant | Celica |
Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |