1967 Audi Variant vs. 1999 Nissan Z
To start off, 1999 Nissan Z is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan Z (197 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1967 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 1967 Audi Variant.
Because 1999 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan Z (245 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1999 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Audi Variant | 1999 Nissan Z | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | Variant | Z |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2450 mm |
