1967 Audi Variant vs. 2001 Nissan HyperMini
To start off, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,988 cc, 2001 Nissan HyperMini is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan HyperMini weights approximately 215 kg more than 1967 Audi Variant.
Because 2001 Nissan HyperMini is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Nissan HyperMini. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan HyperMini (130 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Audi Variant. (128 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan HyperMini will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Audi Variant | 2001 Nissan HyperMini | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | Variant | HyperMini |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 2988 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 2670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 1900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 76 L |