1967 Audi Variant vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Audi Variant would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 281 more horse power than 1967 Audi Variant. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1967 Audi Variant.
Because 2006 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Audi Variant. (133 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Audi Variant | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | Variant | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
