1967 Audi Variant vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Audi Variant would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1342 kg more than 1967 Audi Variant.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Audi Variant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 367 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Audi Variant. (133 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Audi Variant | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | Variant | Commander |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 500 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 90.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 2412 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 78 L |