1967 Audi Variant vs. 2009 Cadillac STS-V
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Audi Variant would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 390 more horse power than 1967 Audi Variant. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1967 Audi Variant.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 462 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Audi Variant. (133 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Audi Variant | 2009 Cadillac STS-V | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | Variant | STS-V |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 4376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 469 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 595 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 64 L |
