1967 Audi Variant vs. 2010 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2010 Nissan Frontier is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Audi Variant would be higher. At 3,953 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Frontier (257 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1967 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1967 Audi Variant.
Because 2010 Nissan Frontier is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Nissan Frontier. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Frontier (281 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Audi Variant | 2010 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | Variant | Frontier |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 3953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 257 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |