1967 Audi Variant vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1967 Audi Variant. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1967 Audi Variant.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Audi Variant. (128 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Audi Variant | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | Variant | Epica |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |