1967 Austin 1300 vs. 1942 Simca 5
To start off, 1967 Austin 1300 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Simca 5 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Austin 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Austin 1300 (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1942 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Austin 1300 should accelerate faster than 1942 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Austin 1300 weights approximately 298 kg more than 1942 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Austin 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 1942 Simca 5 | |
Make | Austin | Simca |
Model | 1300 | 5 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1942 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 570 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 14 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 858 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2010 mm |