1967 Austin 1300 vs. 1948 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1967 Austin 1300 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,488 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Maserati A6G (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1948 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Maserati A6G weights approximately 17 kg more than 1967 Austin 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Austin 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 1948 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Austin | Maserati |
Model | 1300 | A6G |
Year Released | 1967 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 858 kg | 875 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2560 mm |