1967 Austin 1300 vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom

To start off, 1967 Austin 1300 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom (164 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1002 kg more than 1967 Austin 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Austin 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom has automatic transmission and 1967 Austin 1300 has manual transmission. 1967 Austin 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Austin 1300 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
Make Austin Rolls-Royce
Model 1300 Phantom
Year Released 1967 1950
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1275 cc 5673 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 59 HP 164 HP
Engine Bore Size 70.6 mm 88.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.3 mm 114.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.8:1 6.4:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 858 kg 1860 kg
Vehicle Length 3730 mm 5770 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1960 mm
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 3690 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]