1967 Austin 1300 vs. 1959 Jeep CJ5

To start off, 1967 Austin 1300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 322 kg more than 1967 Austin 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 1300. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1959 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 1300.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Austin 1300 1959 Jeep CJ5
Make Austin Jeep
Model 1300 CJ5
Year Released 1967 1959
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1275 cc 3687 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 59 HP 135 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 94 Nm 325 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 2400 RPM
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 858 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Length 3730 mm 3520 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 2060 mm