1967 Austin 1300 vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 1967 Austin 1300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Volvo 120 (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Volvo 120 should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Volvo 120 weights approximately 152 kg more than 1967 Austin 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Austin 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Volvo 120 (145 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 1300. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1964 Volvo 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | 1300 | 120 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 84.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 858 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 45 L |