1967 Austin 1300 vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 1978 Volvo 66 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Austin 1300 (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Austin 1300 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Austin 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 94 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | 1300 | 66 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1550 mm |