1967 Austin 1300 vs. 1980 Mazda 121
To start off, 1980 Mazda 121 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 121 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 121 weights approximately 252 kg more than 1967 Austin 1300.
Because 1980 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Austin 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 1980 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 1300 | 121 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 858 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2520 mm |