1967 Austin 1300 vs. 1982 Dodge 600
To start off, 1982 Dodge 600 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Dodge 600 (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600 should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge 600 weights approximately 307 kg more than 1967 Austin 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 1300. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin 1300 | 1982 Dodge 600 | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | 1300 | 600 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 858 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2630 mm |
