1967 Austin 1300 vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 7 kg more than 1967 Austin 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 1300. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | 1300 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1967 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 94 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 858 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2420 mm |