1967 Austin 1300 vs. 1989 Nissan Micra
To start off, 1989 Nissan Micra is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Austin 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Austin 1300 weights approximately 133 kg more than 1989 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Nissan Micra (96 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 1300. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1989 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 1989 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | 1300 | Micra |
Year Released | 1967 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 858 kg | 725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2310 mm |