1967 Austin 1300 vs. 1996 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1996 Ford Taurus is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 1996 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2760 mm |