1967 Austin 1300 vs. 1996 Holden Nova

To start off, 1996 Holden Nova is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Holden Nova (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Holden Nova weights approximately 232 kg more than 1967 Austin 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden Nova (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 1300. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Holden Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 1300.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Austin 1300 1996 Holden Nova
Make Austin Holden
Model 1300 Nova
Year Released 1967 1996
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1275 cc 1587 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 59 HP 105 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 94 Nm 135 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4800 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 858 kg 1090 kg
Vehicle Length 3730 mm 4280 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 2470 mm