1967 Austin 1300 vs. 1999 Nissan SUT
To start off, 1999 Nissan SUT is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan SUT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan SUT (140 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300.
Because 1999 Nissan SUT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan SUT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan SUT (372 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Austin 1300. (94 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan SUT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Austin 1300. 1999 Nissan SUT has automatic transmission and 1967 Austin 1300 has manual transmission. 1967 Austin 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan SUT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Austin 1300 | 1999 Nissan SUT | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | 1300 | SUT |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Top Speed | 140 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
