1967 Austin 1300 vs. 2003 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Armada is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1967 Austin 1300. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1967 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1146 kg more than 1967 Austin 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Austin 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Austin 1300 | 2003 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Austin | Mahindra |
Model | 1300 | Armada |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 858 kg | 2004 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4310 mm |